Robbie C.M. van Aert
Robbie C.M. van Aert
Overená e-mailová adresa na: tilburguniversity.edu - Domovská stránka
Názov
Citované v
Citované v
Rok
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Open Science Collaboration
Science 349 (6251), 2015
50322015
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
BA Nosek, AA Aarts, JE Anderson, HB Kappes, ...
Science 349 (6251), aac4716-aac4716, 2015
5842015
Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”
DT Gilbert, G King, S Pettigrew, TD Wilson
Science 351 (6277), 1037-1037, 2016
4712016
Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings
RA Klein, M Vianello, F Hasselman, BG Adams, RB Adams Jr, S Alper, ...
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (4), 443-490, 2018
3852018
Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking
JM Wicherts, CLS Veldkamp, HEM Augusteijn, M Bakker, R Van Aert, ...
Frontiers in psychology 7, 1832, 2016
3412016
Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
MALM Van Assen, R van Aert, JM Wicherts
Psychological methods 20 (3), 293, 2015
2072015
Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve
RCM van Aert, JM Wicherts, MALM van Assen
Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (5), 713-729, 2016
1202016
Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results
MALM van Assen, RCM van Aert, MB Nuijten, JM Wicherts
PLoS one 9 (1), e84896, 2014
982014
Distributions of p-values smaller than. 05 in psychology: what is going on?
CHJ Hartgerink, RCM van Aert, MB Nuijten, JM Wicherts, ...
PeerJ 4, e1935, 2016
542016
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis
RCM Van Aert, JM Wicherts, MALM Van Assen
PloS one 14 (4), e0215052, 2019
412019
The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
HEM Augusteijn, R van Aert, MALM van Assen
Psychological methods 24 (1), 116, 2019
382019
Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication
RCM Van Aert, MALM Van Assen
Behavior Research Methods 50 (4), 1515-1539, 2018
292018
Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study
RCM van Aert, MALM Van Assen
PloS one 12 (4), e0175302, 2017
252017
REPORTING GUIDELINES FOR META‐ANALYSIS IN ECONOMICS
T Havránek, TD Stanley, H Doucouliagos, P Bom, J Geyer‐Klingeberg, ...
Journal of Economic Surveys, 2020
122020
Correcting for publication bias in a meta-analysis with the p-uniform* method
RCM van Aert, M van Assen
Manuscript submitted for publication Retrieved from: https://osfio/preprints …, 2018
112018
Puniform: Meta-analysis methods correcting for publication bias
RCM van Aert
R package version 0.0 3, 2017
112017
Multistep estimators of the between‐study variance: The relationship with the Paule‐Mandel estimator
RCM van Aert, D Jackson
Statistics in medicine 37 (17), 2616-2629, 2018
92018
Comparing confidence intervals for Goodman and Kruskal's gamma coefficient
LA van der Ark, RCM van Aert
Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 85 (12), 2491-2505, 2015
92015
Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research
MB Nuijten, MALM van Assen, RCM van Aert, JM Wicherts
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (7), E712-E713, 2014
92014
A new justification of the Hartung‐Knapp method for random‐effects meta‐analysis based on weighted least squares regression
RCM van Aert, D Jackson
Research Synthesis Methods 10 (4), 515-527, 2019
82019
Systém momentálne nemôže vykonať operáciu. Skúste to neskôr.
Články 1–20